On Tuesday, voters in the Gallatin Valley will decide which candidates in contested primaries will head to the general election in November to represent them in Helena.
The Chronicle spoke with all the candidates for the contested House districts that impact Gallatin County to learn more of their views and ideas as they take on members of their own political party.
The following has been edited for length and clarity.
Bozeman Daily Chronicle: What should voters know about you and why should they vote for you? What do you bring to the table that other politicians might not?
I have been a resident of the Gallatin Valley for 15 years. I’ve been a fishing guide for 10 of those 15 years. I’ve worked a lot of jobs, paid rent and I’ve fought to carve out my place in this valley. I sympathize and empathize with other people who are finding it tough to live here right now, whether that be because of cost increases or threats to women’s reproductive freedoms or whether it’s the quality of education or teachers who aren’t getting paid enough.
My career exemplifies my dedication to environmental and energy policy issues. For the past 16 years, I’ve been an engineer for a renewable energy developer or manufacturer of renewable energy products. Before that, I was a land use and environmental planner for five years working on watershed planning and preserving critical habitat. I grew up, born and raised, in North Dakota, I’m gay, and my dad worked in the oil drilling industry. I’ve always had to convince people to hear my side of things and to see my side of the story — I think that’s a very powerful set of tools to go into the legislature.
I have a thirty-year record of public service in this community. I was chairman of Galavan. I was chairman of the city task force that led to Streamline. I co-wrote the city charter including ethics reform. I pushed through the smoke fuel ordinance. I wrote the first dark sky ordinance in the state. In my 30 years here, I have improved public transportation, public health and government. I have demonstrably improved the lives of people in this community.
I’m working two jobs in the service industry. I’m a renter. I feel like a lot of what we’re seeing in Helena is pretty distant from people’s day-to-day lives and I am really trying to work on issues like affordability of living, because that’s something I’m experiencing firsthand and hearing from constituents — I wouldn’t just be coming at it from a policy perspective but have lived experience. I really want to try to be reaching across the aisle and building coalitions to get the work done to make life better for everyone who lives in our state.
Rep. Jennifer Carlson (R)
I’m a workhorse, not a showhorse. What sets me apart from my opponents? Honesty, integrity, civility and hard work — in and out of session. A two-term legislator from Churchill. Elected as a Majority Whip, Chairman of House Health & Human Services Committee, and two terms on the House Judiciary. I have lived my whole life in Montana, graduated from MSU with a degree in Biomedical Science, and have lived in this district for 25 years. I have raised 5 children here — in public school, private school and home school. Four sons have graduated from Manhattan High School. I understand being part of the community, making ends meet and navigating bureaucracy.
I am the only member in this race with military service and served in the Army National Guard for 6 years as an 11c Indirect Fire Infantryman (Mortarman), going from E1 Private to leadership as an E5 Sergeant. In the legislature, I was selected for leadership as Chair of the Legislative Administration Committee. I am also the only member of this race with a strong enough conservative record to be a member of the Montana Freedom Caucus. What separates me from my opponents, is that I do not play political games or make deals at the expense of our liberties. My yes is a yes, and my no is a no on principle.
I have a lot more experience than my opponents, both in business and in life and certainly the legislature. I served for 16 years in the legislature at a high level. I was president of the Senate twice. I was Speaker of the House. I’ve spent the last three-plus years working for the governor in different capacities. I got a lot more experience than my opponents who have been involved in the state government for a couple of sessions.
In this district, I think it’s important that I’m a native of Manhattan — I was born and raised in Manhattan. I went all the way through school here, went to undergraduate school at Montana State, came back from Optometry school, practiced Optometry for forty years and retired 18 months ago, so I know the area — my whole life has been spent here. That’s why I chose this district to run in. I’m conservative. I was endorsed by the governor a couple of weeks ago because he feels like he can work with me and we can reach across the aisles, consider other’s ideas and reach common ground and come up with solutions.
I’m the only proven Trump conservative candidate with a track record for getting things done. My constituents want smaller government, less taxes, and traditional family values. I’m the only candidate that can deliver that.
BDC: If successful, you’ll represent your district but what you do in the legislature has statewide implications. Based on that micro and macro lens, what are your top two or three issues and why are those most important to you?
Property tax reform because I want to make it more affordable for everyone to live here. Protecting women’s reproductive freedoms because I don’t believe it’s any business of the government what happens between a woman and her doctor. Access to public lands in Montana is what makes Montana great and getting more money into public schools.
Housing is the number one most critical issue in the state right now — it’s affecting everyone’s ability to thrive. The ban on inclusionary zoning is one of the biggest pieces of legislation that I would like to see reversed. Property taxes — the inability to deal with that in the last legislative session and to equalize that was a dereliction. Montana has a very archaic backward energy policy right now and there are ways to reach across the aisle in terms of looking at our utility business model here in the state such that we incentivize the source of energy, perhaps differently, giving a higher return on investment for renewables, and maybe lower for carbon-based.
The top issue is property taxes. The situation right now is a result of a completely irresponsible policy by the Republican legislature and the governor. Other issues include modernizing Montana’s tax system and protecting seniors from exploitation. And finally, we have people who are really being squeezed like tenants in trailer parks and tenants in apartments by property management companies. They need more protection.
Affordability of living is something that everyone is grappling with, such as homeowners seeing the increase in property tax bills and renters seeing that trickle down into their rent increases. Another major issue is the adequate funding of public education. It’s been really hard the last few years to see just how challenging it is for teachers and students and it’s really important that our state stay focused on making sure that public schools have adequate funding before they direct it elsewhere.
We need to treat our children better: both personally and through government agency policy. Better mental health outcomes require better policies in child welfare, school policy, and public safety. Montana needs facilities and services for mental health crisis stabilization — people need a place to go to receive treatment in a timely manner. Law enforcement needs to have a place for people to go instead of jail when the problem is a mental health crisis. 99% of incarcerated people will return to the community at some point. We need the system to adjust policies to that reality and we can make intelligent decisions to reduce recidivism and keep our communities safer.
My top issue, as it has been, is government spending and property taxes. The problem at hand is every level of government nickels and dimes the populace to pay for petty pointless projects or programs. Checking unwarranted government growth and spending is the solution, and the best way to do that is to check their pocketbook, therefore, there should be a spending cap based on population/growth for local governments, and any spending above that cap should be approved by the voters. This will cause governments to focus on allocating tax revenue to pay for essential services that benefit everyone equally.
My Second issue is returning over-collected tax revenue. In the 2023 session, we had a record of 2.5 billion in over-collected taxes. Only roughly 1 billion was actually returned to the taxpayers, while the rest was used to grow the government. If re-elected my main priority will be bringing a ballot initiative to the voters in 2026 that will allow them to approve a system where over-collected tax dollars will be returned automatically to the taxpayer without requiring the legislature to convene. Not having bucket loads of extra money will help the legislature and the state to be more fiscally responsible
Property tax has not been addressed by the legislature in the last couple of sessions and is becoming for a lot of people an unbearable burden. The thing that really aggravated me in the last legislative session was while taxpayers like myself got a $1,250 rebate on income and a $675 rebate on property tax, they enriched themselves with a tax-free per diem increase. The two opponents voted for that and one of them voted for a roughly 70% increase in salary which the Governor vetoed.
Property taxes are important because they’re out of control. My wife and I have probably knocked on at least 800 doors and by far the number one concern is property taxes and the stupendous increases that we’ve undergone in the last two years — something needs to be done. Another issue is protecting Montana values such as parental rights, property rights… safe neighborhoods, and support our law enforcement, boys are boys and girls are girls. We need to protect the farmers and ranchers — I think there’s a real basic fabric of the society of Montana.
Reduce property taxes for ALL Montanans. I have 3 bills that I’ve already written that do just that. Protect Montanans from the impacts of illegal immigrants. I have 2 bills that I’ve already written that do just that. Stop the woke agenda which is destroying our children, families, communities, and Montana. I have 2 bills that I’ve already written that do just that.
BDC: What bills do you think are most likely to pass this upcoming session with bipartisan support and what issues do you think your colleagues across the aisle realistically support?
I have what I call red-line issues, issues that I’m uncompromising on. That’s any threat to women’s reproductive freedoms, public lands, any attempts at union busting, any attempts at unwinding LGBTQIA+ protections and public education. Everything else is a compromise.
Ideally, we won’t be in the supermajority anymore due to redistricting and hopefully, we will have a more supportive governor. I think there are opportunities for these win-win situations if we look hard enough and when we spend the time and put in the work to find them (such as energy policy).
There has been bipartisan legislation passed in the last legislature that would have improved people’s lives that the Governor vetoed. Republicans back in their districts are hearing from the public…
Get any of our free daily email newsletters — news headlines, opinion, e-edition, obituaries and more.