The Supreme Court issued several significant rulings on Friday, including a case that limits obstruction charges against individuals involved in the January 6 riot.
In a 6-3 decision, the court stated that there must be evidence of an attempt to tamper with documents or records in order to bring obstruction charges.
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, emphasized that the intention of the law was not to impose severe penalties on all defendants accused of obstruction of justice.
This ruling will now be applied by a lower court, potentially leading to the dismissal of charges against other defendants from the January 6 incident.
Related Story:Supreme Court says DOJ went too far with charges against Jan. 6 rioters
Justice Amy Coney Barrett authored the dissent, arguing that the court’s narrow interpretation of the law did not respect the authority of the legislative and executive branches.
Joseph Fischer’s attorney, Jeffrey Green, expressed relief for his client after the Supreme Court’s decision in their favor.
Green remarked, “It’s always nice to beat the government at the United States Supreme Court — that doesn’t happen very often.”
This ruling may also have implications for the federal case against former President Donald Trump, who faces a similar obstruction charge.
